Blog

  • Designing for Dignity: Lessons from Ladakh on Circular Fashion and Resilience

    It’s been six years since this story unfolded, but it shaped everything I do today.

    I still remember crunching numbers at my first job—calculating production costs in an export house, comparing them to inflated markups on the final product, understanding how mass production functioned. Or rather, how it didn’t. Not for people. Not for the planet. As studies confirm, the bulk of fashion’s value is retained by brands and retailers, while the people who craft our garments—primarily women—receive less than 2% of the final retail price. Fast fashion thrives on this disparity, profiting from economies of scale while externalizing environmental and social costs. In 2018, the United Nations reported that the fashion industry was responsible for about 20% of global wastewater and 10% of carbon emissions—more than international flights and maritime shipping combined. Mass production did not work; not in a way that honors either human dignity or ecological limits.

    That rejection led to a kind of pilgrimage—a journey to the Himalayas in search of something I couldn’t name then.

    I was still finding my footing when I stumbled across Looms of Ladakh. I cold-emailed Abhilasha Bahuguna, who generously gave me a chance. Next thing I knew, I was living in a remote village, working directly with women artisans on design interventions and helping set up their cooperative.

    Discovering Design as Dignity

    As a fashion design graduate, I thought I understood what design meant. But this was the first time I saw its true power—not just to create, but to organize. To build dignity, livelihoods, and systems. Design as infrastructure, not just output.

    It was here—a girl from Mumbai—that I first lived a fully circular life. Fetching water at -30°C. Melting snow to wash fabric. Watching food waste feed cattle. Nothing went to waste, not even time. Even gossip was recycled with care.

    There was a day a snowstorm hit. I assumed we’d stay in. But the women looked at me and said, “Aaj chhutti nahin hai.” Three kilometers uphill to the cooperative, and they showed me what resilience truly looks like. No fear. No fight. Just adaptation. Nature wasn’t an enemy or a resource. It was a rhythm.

    The Dark Reality: Exploiting Sustainability

    Yet the more I saw, the more I realized how the language of sustainability is being co-opted. Greenwashing pervades the industry: in a 2021 analysis, over 50% of claims made by major ‘sustainable’ fashion brands were found to be misleading or unsubstantiated. Certifications are treated as marketing tools, not as guarantees of fair practices. Fast fashion giants churn out “eco” lines, but continue producing at volumes that negate any environmental savings.

    • The average consumer today buys 60% more clothing than 15 years ago, yet keeps each item for half as long.
    • Less than 1% of clothing is recycled into new garments; most ends up in landfills or incinerators.

    Gaps in the Market and Unjust Rewards

    What’s most disheartening is the persistent gap in recognition and reward for the people and systems truly making a difference:

    ChallengeData Point / Evidence
    Living wages for artisansMost garment workers in the Global South earn far below living wages, with only a fraction of fashion profits reaching them1.
    Value recognitionArtisanal, low-impact textiles often cost 2–3x more to produce but fetch only marginally higher prices compared to fast fashion products1.
    Small brand strugglesBrands advocating circularity and local value chains lack access to marketing budgets or buyer networks, rendering their efforts nearly invisible amid greenwashed advertising.

    I didn’t have the language back then—“circularity,” “just transitions,” “value chain equity.” But I knew. I knew I had to work with brands that cared for the entire chain, that didn’t cut corners or stories.

    Years later, when I joined 200 Million Artisans, it all came full circle. I learned the anatomy of handmade enterprises, how business models shape lives, how climate resilience and inclusion are design problems as much as business ones.

    And now, I find myself circling back to that Himalayan winter more often than not. That first lesson in dignity. In systems. In patience. In presence.

  • ⁠How Prada’s 1 Lakh ‘Sandal’ Exposes India’s Cultural IP Crisis

    A Sunset Industry for India making Millions Abroad.

    Prada just slapped a ₹1 lakh tag on a Kolhapuri chappal .. Except they didn’t call it that.

    Image credit: Prada

    There was no mention of Kolhapuri. No nod to the GI tag (granted in 2019). No credit to the artisan communities in India who’ve been crafting the design for generations. Just another “minimalist leather sandal” – rebranded, resold, and recontextualised on a European runway.

    Firstly, it’s 2025. Giving credit isn’t optional. It’s reparative. Prada had a choice. They could’ve credited the design and used their platform to highlight Indian craft in a moment of shared global attention. Instead, they chose theft

    But what unsettles me more than Prada’s plunder is the deeper cracks in how India values – or fails to value – its own cultural capital, due to which we can’t really hold annyone accountable. 

    Let’s break it down.

    Most policymakers in India dismiss crafts as a “sunset industry.” But if this is sunset, it’s glowing bright in Milan.  While India sidelines its cultural economy, the global luxury market is turning our legacy into millions.

    Europe protects its wines and cheese with institutional power and trade muscle. India’s cultural IP, by contrast, is left exposed. 

    Here’s the crux of the problem:

    Kolhapuri chappals are protected by a Geographical Indication tag, but GI only protects the name, not the design. So unless Prada calls them “Kolhapuris,” they’re legally in the clear – even if the design is a near replica.

    Let’s zoom out for a moment. According to WIPO’s 2024 IP Facts and Figures:

    • China has over 9,000 registered GIs
    • The EU collectively has over 6,000
    • India? Just 478.

    In a country with over 3,000 documented crafts and countless regional food traditions, that number isn’t just low, it’s criminal. Worse, even the GIs we do register exist as footnotes and are rarely enforced, marketed, or monetised.

    Kolhapuri vs. Champagne: The Same IP Used But Vastly Different Outcomes

    France guards Champagne like its national treasure. Protected under the EU’s powerful GI regime and enforced in over 120 countries, it has:

    • A dedicated trade body (Comité Champagne) that monitors misuse, sues violators, and promotes its identity
    • Legal muscle to pursue brands in countries like the U.S., Brazil, and Russia for misusing its identity
    • And a place in France’s export strategy, sold as terroir, luxury, and national pride

    Compare that to India, where GI-tagged crafts barely make it past local exhibitions, and often lack the legal or financial capacity to fight misuse, especially on global platforms.

    India’s IP Needs Muscle. We Built It. We Should Own It.

    If we’re serious about protecting Indian design, here’s what we need:

    • Strengthen IP laws to include not just names, but visual identity, motifs, designs, and forms
    • Create licensing and co-creation platforms so that when global brands want to use Indian heritage, they partner and pay fairly
    • Rebrand GIs from bureaucratic labels to cultural trademarks – worthy of investment, storytelling, and market presence
    • Integrate cultural IP into India’s export and nation branding strategy
    • Build enforceable cross-border IP ecosystems, including recognition treaties with the EU and beyond

    Until then, let’s stop being surprised when global brands cherry-pick our heritage and call it innovation. 

    If India won’t invest in building cultural capital, someone else will. And they’ll sell it back to us – at 1000x the price, and zero acknowledgment.

    Every time a global brand sells Indian craft without credit, it’s not just a missed opportunity, it’s a transfer of value, narrative, and power.

    It’s time we stopped tolerating the theft of our traditions and started building systems that protect, promote, and pay those who created them.